Now see, I don't know if I agree with Wastelandstoic on this. I believe the mist totems were created as a money sink, but that being said I do believe they were to be used by everyone, including the small one man tribes. I am not sure it would be fair to only allow those with multiple accounts or who are lucky enough to recruit enough members to have a mist totem that they can secure only for themselves. Unfair advantages are just that, unfair. Right, you are going to say how is it unfair if a tribe works to recruit and grow? Just that, anyone who can afford to buy multiple accounts can have their own personal totem. Does this strike you as fair to those who want to play, want the bps, but cant really afford but just one account? The fact that a tribe can have them on their own tribe land, is the benefit, I don't think being able to keep them for their own personal use is the right answer. If you want the community to grow, you need to allow access and opportunity for new players to obtain schemes equally. New players can work very hard to get the money to buy the schemes from jobs, trades, etc. I am pretty sure if one is actually permitted to keep their own personal mist totem, then all tribes will eventually follow. THIS will not help the community to grow. I would like to know what the initial intention for the mist totem was and to have this cleared up. If nothing else, make the mist totems accessible on founders and open to all.