Is the question in regards to 2 servers of the same ruleset?
Or 1 server with the normal ruleset and 1 server with the "chaos" ruleset?
Jordi can you please clarify?? This would drastically change my vote.
Is the question in regards to 2 servers of the same ruleset?
Or 1 server with the normal ruleset and 1 server with the "chaos" ruleset?
Jordi can you please clarify?? This would drastically change my vote.
Funny, I was originally going to reply stating that I never received this email - Just as I did, Outlook went ding and there it was..
The two servers thing was going to be US server and UK server, I know ping in the UK might be bad, but I don't think splitting the servers will be a good idea. I played MO which the server was based in Sweden I think. Or Arizona, I don't remember. But it was playable to all.
A pvp server and pve server would be horrible. Sure, there is an influx in players because of launch, but segregating those 2 types of populations would ultimately defeat the purpose of the game lol.
Is it an NA and EU server? hopefully?
Based on the Questions I was thinking this was the purpose: If all the people with placed totems vote to not have a clean start they could offer a second server where everyone gets a fresh start. . so everyone is satisfied.
For example. . if they keep one server I would vote no to keeping totems (even though I have one saved). if they added a second server I would vote yes to keeping the original totems on the first server assuming the servers are the same ruleset.
Given that lag seems to be caused by teraforming etc. etc. it seems like slitting the population up might be the best way to resolve some of the technical issues for launch until some more things can be figured out. This is all guessing though.