Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14
  1. #11
    Visitor BigCountry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Way down deep in a bottle of ale...
    Posts
    414
    during a "release" phase, there should not be rollbacks. You can have lag, but not rollbacks. Rollbacks would be very bad...
    hehe

  2. #12
    Xsyon Citizen Dade512's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Oklahoma City
    Posts
    178
    2.5mo is more than fair. Two weeks more than I thought we would have. That puts us to what...about May 24. I was able to play for a while last night, my ping was erratic but never more than a couple second delay.

  3. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Dade512 View Post
    2.5mo is more than fair. Two weeks more than I thought we would have. That puts us to what...about May 24. I was able to play for a while last night, my ping was erratic but never more than a couple second delay.
    Sure, it's fair. IF the game is up and I can play.

    If it takes 6 months to get that 2.5 months, that's probably a bad thing.

    If it takes 2.75 months to get 2.5 months of play time, not so bad, means I lost a day or two that they compensated for.

  4. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by BigCountry View Post
    during a "release" phase, there should not be rollbacks. You can have lag, but not rollbacks. Rollbacks would be very bad...
    hehe
    this! I tought rollbacks before release on every reset where a bad thing but well, it was beta. now constant rollbacks on a released game, thats a big nono

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •