I already said how I would avoid that problem.I would pick a spot which is not good for a big tribe. And yes there will be times when we will have to ask for new zones...when the world will be filled with totems, just like today. You know, that's why they always planned to add new zones...they knew players will fill the world. That's only matter of time in a game with non-instanced housing.
If you know a nice spot give me the coords please. I haven't found one.
FFA PvP is in game. Full looting is still broken ? Animal mutation is working as far as I know. New lands are more important to give space to new players, otherwise they will be frustrated and will leave the game.
DDT, I think you made your point clear. You want useless totems which have already taken up space for 8 months to stay in game 6 more months minimum, so that the players who haven't come back during this 8 months can get another 6 months minimum to make up their mind.
At the same time, you are against of opening up new land, because...I'm not sure why. It was ready to patch out 5 months ago, and even if it needed a bit more testing it would be well worth the time.
I don't want to see another failed influx of players...after advertising the game the incoming players will leave the game in days frustrated and angry because they will find a dead-looking world filled with abandoned totems and no space to settle down.
They need a fresh start and not the feeling that there was a game here half a year ago, but they missed the train. But thankfully its not up to you neither up to me to decide, the devs will decide which is worth more for them and which solution THEY think would benefit the game more.
I'm done arguing with you about this.