the concern about "mobile safezones" is flawed

[Kroom]

It’s propaganda to drive development to what they want (grief). They won’t be happy until they can…

[fflhktsn]

i can already grief

i just want balance and a true sandbox...not areana pvp where its all consentual.

[Burnt]

i just want balance and a true sandbox...not areana pvp where its all consentual.

The problem is, balance and a 'true sandbox', by your definition is impossible. Safe zones create balance between crafting and pvp. And since when was anywhere not in my safe zone considered 'consensual arena pvp'? It's more like; FFA full loot pvp as soon as I step outside my small building area...

[fflhktsn]

The problem is, balance and a 'true sandbox', by your definition is impossible. Safe zones create balance between crafting and pvp. A since when was anywhere not in my safe zone considered 'consensual arena pvp'? It's more like; FFA full loot pvp as soon as I step outside my small building area...

beaten to death in my thread concerning this.. you cant understand because to understand means you have to agree with a view other than yours.

[orious13]

beaten to death in my thread concerning this.. you cant understand because to understand means you have to agree with a view other than yours.

This is by far exactly what you're doing.
I'd love a "true sandbox". Sadly this game is a sandbox and not a "true sandbox". You have to realize that your vision of this game is not THE vision of this game.

But... back to the topic.

Mobile safezones aren't going to hurt anything. It doesn't take long to understand why.
The game will have them for the next 6 months.
This can change, but it will not change at the moment.
There are only like 3 or 4 people out of 20 or 30 regulars who can't grasp this. For those people it might be best to return when the safe zones are gone and those tools for allowing player protection may or may not be in place. You cannot protect effectively with broken combat, no walls, no real gates, no economy, no moral compass.

[Burnt]

beaten to death in my thread concerning this.. you cant understand because to understand means you have to agree with a view other than yours.

You do realise I never made a post in your thread? Oh, and read this to yourself very carefully:

You have to realize that your vision of this game is not THE vision of this game.

[Silicor]

I agree whole tribes won't be getting up an leaving. However, nothing is stopping a group from leaving the tribe and creating another tribe on the resource to deplete it. I hope this isn't a problem, but it might