View Poll Results: Would you like Safe Zone Removal as proposed?

Voters
61. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    16 26.23%
  • Yes, but a with switch to turn on / off safe zones.

    26 42.62%
  • No

    19 31.15%
Results 1 to 10 of 36

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    I really like the idea the conflict zones idea, the removal of the totem protection in medium or higher areas would give the tribes reason to want those conflict zones.





    We can simplify that idea by having all High+ Danger zones be available for conquest totems, Connect the upkeep cost of the conquest totems to the number of total conquest totems globally. Let the controlling tribe flip the zone to +resources or +safezone.




    DONE, we basically have a game of advance and secure at this point and players that basically only want something to fight can fight over what zones offer more protection or resources. As more and more players or zones fall under conquest the cost should increase, resulting in more things and work for players to do.

    Then Ooloo and Whorlok can work towards protecting the zone they live in by participating in the conquest idea.
    Last edited by xyberviri; 02-06-2016 at 07:07 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •